International Law Enforcement

Where activities involve using force against others, we not only deprive those against whom the protection of regulations strikes, we additionally deprive ourselves of the protection of this law. We become, actually, outlaws. Weak outlaws endure ostracism or punishment. Outlaws that are robust tend to become tyrants. The tyranny is profound, when force is used by the local policeman outside the limit of law. When the self-appointed cop isn’t just carrying a baton but an arsenal of cruise missiles, it is, quite honestly , terrifying. Whilst the policeman is on your side you could feel a false sense of security. At its best it is the sort of security Hobbes encouraged.

It only needs to be used beyond the borders of the sovereign states that are powerful that it was initially imagined. The main issue with its extension has become the doubt that there’s this type of thing as international law due to the insufficient enforcement mechanisms.

Among people who do accept the existence of international law (as must be the case with those who seek to demand it), there is too little confidence in international associations to enforce that law, and, possibly, a corresponding overconfidence in the power of national institutions to do so. But yet great national institutions might be, they are not empowered to adjudicate by their own state in another.

The rule of law is unable to be compartmentalized and confined within the boundaries of Enlightenment states. Institutionalized and it must be globalised in genuinely international bodies.

To assert that state sovereignty must be overridden by international norms also involves acknowledging that the same standards that are international override your own claims .

Suggested

Previous post:

Next post: